![]() |
||||
![]() | ||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
Maasai in this region traditionally fell into the general category of transhumant pastoralists. However, a number of factors are currently putting pressure on traditional pastoral coping mechanisms and the ability of Maasai herders to maintain extensive grazing patterns. Ongoing land tenure change driven in large part by national policy related to liberalization is a primary driver affecting household decision-making in this system. Since the 1960s, the pastoral landscape has been fragmented through the creation of group ranches and their subsequent subdivision which significantly limits the mobility of herding households. The ecology of this system sets strong limits on the land use options available to pastoralists, and the interaction between land tenure change, an inherently patchy landscape mosaic, and government conservation policies mean that the traditional movement mechanisms of Maasai to cope with variability and drought are now curtailed within increasingly smaller areas. In response pastoralists are making substantial efforts to diversify their production strategies into agriculture (in key resource areas), small business and wage labor. In this rapidly changing economic environment, traditional cooperation and enabling mechanisms (e.g., livestock sharing, stock associations) have less importance in mitigating risk for pastoral households. However, traditional social relationships (i.e., conceptualized as social capital) may remain critical in supporting the exchange of grazing lands in the new context of land privatization. Rising Maasai populations as well as substantial in-migration by non-Maasai are putting increasing pressure on ecological resources, while poor investment in physical infrastructure (e.g., roads, services and markets) again limit the household decision-making options available to Maasai as they seek to mitigate changes in land tenure and ecology, while trying to capitalize on new opportunities represented by economic diversification.
Return to the map of sites.
| ||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |